| HS Code | 181642 |
| Product Name | Tech-3827 Waterborne System Silicone Antifoam Emulsion |
| Chemical Type | Silicone antifoam emulsion |
| Appearance | Milky white to off-white liquid |
| Physical Form | Low-viscosity water-based emulsion |
| Active Silicone Content | Approximately 20-25 wt% |
| Ionic Character | Nonionic |
| Viscosity | 500-1500 mPa·s at 25°C |
| Ph | 6.0-8.0 at 25°C |
| Specific Gravity | 1.00-1.04 at 25°C |
| Water Dispersibility | Fully dispersible in water |
| Solvent Content | Waterborne, low/non-VOC |
| Flash Point | Non-flammable (aqueous system) |
| Storage Stability | Stable for 12 months in sealed original containers at 5-35°C |
| Freeze Thaw Stability | Sensitive to freezing; protect from temperatures below 5°C |
As an accredited Tech-3827 Waterborne System Silicone Antifoam Emulsion factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | This silicone antifoam emulsion is packaged in 25 kg HDPE pails with sealed, tamper-evident lids and clear hazard labeling. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL loading of Tech-3827 silicone antifoam emulsion in sealed drums/pails, secured properly, with complete documentation and hazard labeling. |
| Shipping | Shipped in sealed, labeled containers to prevent leakage and contamination. Suitable for standard freight by road, rail, or sea; protect from freezing and excessive heat. Keep upright and away from direct sunlight. Although non-hazardous under normal transport conditions, handling must follow the Safety Data Sheet and applicable chemical shipping regulations. |
| Storage | Store Tech-3827 in its original, tightly sealed container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight and heat sources. Protect from freezing as this can destabilize the waterborne emulsion. Ideal storage range is 5–35°C. Avoid contamination by keeping containers closed when not in use. Follow manufacturer guidelines for shelf life. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life: 12 months from date of manufacture when stored unopened in original container, protected from freezing and extreme heat. |
During the letdown phase of low-VOC waterborne architectural coatings, Tech-3827 emulsion is introduced after high-speed dispersion has ended and the batch temperature has fallen below 40°C. The dominant production constraint occurs when a Cowles disperser running at tip speeds of 15–25 m/s entrains air into a styrene-acrylic latex; the entrained air increases apparent viscosity, slows deaeration, and complicates discharge through 150 µm vibrating filters. Batch-to-batch variance in latex emulsifier load can shift the required defoamer level by approximately 0.05 wt%; this is measured by ASTM D3601-88(2014) bottle test foam volume after 60 s settling. Compliance for this sector is set by EU 2004/42/EC Phase A volatile organic compound limits for interior matt wall paints at 30 g/L and by ASTM D3601-88(2014) foam volume recording. Formulation addition of 0.05 wt% to 0.30 wt% on total liquid coating is typical; the lower end is used for high-PVC flat wall paints, while the upper end applies to low-PVC gloss and semi-gloss formulations that contain higher free surfactant. Downstream process sequence is dispersion, grind, letdown, filtration through 150 µm vibrating filter, and filling into 20 L or 200 L containers via rotary piston fillers. Terminal finished product categories include interior emulsion wall paints, exterior masonry coatings, water-based wood primers, and tinted retail paint bases.
Water-based flexographic ink systems using amine-neutralized acrylic resins exhibit foam-induced viscosity drift when Tech-3827 is not retained through the recirculation loop. In a central impression flexo press with a chamber doctor blade and anilox roll speeds above 120 m/min, foam is generated at the doctor blade return and at the ink sump cascade, producing print density variation and ghosting on high-speed runs. The relevant compliance matrix includes EuPIA Guideline for Good Manufacturing Practice for Food Contact Inks and REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006; indirect food-contact prints are additionally evaluated under FDA 21 CFR 175.300 when the substrate is a functional barrier. Formulation addition ranges from 0.10 wt% to 0.40 wt% of total ink weight, with post-letdown addition after final pH adjustment to 8.8–9.5. The downstream production process encompasses resin cut, pigment dispersion via bead mill, letdown under a low-shear propeller, pH adjustment with ammonia or monoethanolamine, and final filtration through a 10 µm bag filter before press charging. Multiple production lots show that adding the defoamer before the bead mill reduces its efficiency by shear-induced emulsion collapse, so the addition point is deliberately shifted to the low-shear letdown tank. Terminal printed outputs include flexible packaging surface prints on polyolefin films, corrugated board preprint liner, paper sacks, and multiwall bags.
At a liquor-to-goods ratio of 1:5 to 1:8 in high-temperature jet dyeing machines, foam build-up in the fabric storage chamber changes fabric rope payload and reduces transportation speed, leading to crease marks on knitted cotton and polyester-elastane goods. Tech-3827 is applied at 0.05 g/L to 0.20 g/L in the process bath, usually after salts, leveling agents, and dyes are pre-dispersed, because adding it simultaneously with acidic auxiliaries can destabilize the emulsion. Batch-to-batch variation in residual oils from textile greige goods may increase foam load by 20–30% and require a stepwise defoamer top-up during the pre-wash stage. Compliance for textile dyeing includes Oeko-Tex Standard 100 limit values for residual substances in finished textile articles and ZDHC Manufacturing Restricted Substances List v3.1; the defoamer must not contribute to extractable silicone levels that exceed brand-specific RSL thresholds. Production-scale equipment in this sector includes soft-flow and air-jet dyeing machines operating at 2–4 bar nozzle pressure and temperatures up to 135°C for disperse dyeing of polyester. The foam conflict is most severe during the heating ramp from 70°C to 130°C when dissolved air solubility decreases and air comes out of solution at the pump suction. Terminal product classes are custom-dyed tubular knit for underwear, sportswear jersey, terry towel, and automotive textile dyed fabrics.
In an industrial activated sludge plant receiving pre-treated detergent or textile effluent, fine-bubble diffusers generate stable foam when influent surfactant load exceeds 50 mg/L as COD equivalents of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate. Tech-3827 is dosed at 2–20 mg/L of mixed liquor, typically through a peristaltic pump into the aeration basin effluent weir or the clarifier launder rather than into the high-shear diffuser zone. Compliance for the treated discharge is governed by EU Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU and local NPDES permit limits for biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. The downstream process is continuous activated sludge treatment: primary clarification, aeration with fine-bubble membrane diffusers, secondary clarification, and optional tertiary sand filtration. The use boundary is narrow: Tech-3827 is effective against surfactant-stabilized foam but does not eliminate filamentous foam caused by Nocardioform actinomycetes; for that condition, sludge age and food-to-microorganism ratio adjustments are required. Terminal outputs are clarified effluent meeting discharge criteria, reclaimed process water, and dewatered waste-activated sludge.
Aqueous suspension concentrate and water-based emulsion agrochemical batches containing 8–20 wt% nonionic surfactant loads generate persistent foam during bead milling and again during rotary filling, where foam entrapment in 1 L and 5 L HDPE containers causes under-fill and batch rejection. Tech-3827 is introduced at 0.01–0.20 wt% of the total formulation; the lower end is typical for concentrated herbicide suspension concentrates, while the upper end is used for emulsifiable concentrate-to-aqueous dilution product forms. The compliance boundary is set by CIPAC MT 47.3 persistent foam measurement and FAO/WHO Manual for Pesticide Specifications; residual silicone content must be disclosed for registration because some countries restrict silicone adjuvants in certain food crop uses. Production processing includes raw active sieving, high-shear pre-dispersion, sequential bead milling with 0.6–0.8 mm zirconium oxide beads, cooling to 25°C, and filling through piston fillers. Lab batch retention data from pilot lines indicate that adding the silicone defoamer before the final milling pass can increase droplet coalescence in the supernatant after 14 days at 54°C accelerated storage, so the addition is typically split between the pre-mix and post-mill letdown. Finished products include herbicidal aqueous suspension concentrates, fungicide flowables, insecticide suspension concentrates, and seed treatment slurries.
In water-based acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive coating, foam bubbles in the adhesive supply pan become defects in the adhesive film after slot-die deposition on release liner. Tech-3827 is added at 0.10–0.40 wt% of wet adhesive mass after the final letdown and before the coating head filtration stage. Compliance for the adhesive article is evaluated under FDA 21 CFR 175.105 for indirect food-contact adhesives and under REACH (EC) No 1907/2006 for monomer and additive restrictions; for labels used in children’s products, brand-specific RSL requirements may impose additional silicone extractable limits. Production-scale equipment includes modular slot-die coaters, 10 µm edge filter housings, and corona treaters running at line speeds from 80 m/min to 300 m/min. The critical process conflict is that high-shear filtration can strip the silicone emulsion, reducing defoaming efficiency while the coating head back-pressure increases. Therefore, the addition point is placed after the filter housing but before the positive displacement gear pump, with gentle recirculation to avoid air re-entrainment. Real-line failure records show that foam-related coat-weight sigma increases above 0.8 g/m² at line speeds beyond 120 m/min if the defoamer is added below the 0.10 wt% threshold. Terminal product categories are paper label stock, filmic labels, double-sided tape carriers, and protective film laminates.
Liquid laundry and hard-surface cleaner compounding using alkyl polyglucoside and alcohol ethoxylate surfactant systems produces viscous foam that traps air in filling lines and reduces specific gravity. Tech-3827 is applied at 0.005–0.05 wt% of finished detergent mass; addition is made after neutralization and before fragrance addition because fragrance terpenes can alter emulsion stability. Compliance includes Detergent Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 Annex VI for surfactant ultimate aerobic biodegradability and CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for classification and labeling. Production process includes batch mixing in 5,000 L jacketed vessels with pitched-blade turbines, chilling to below 30°C, and filling through mass flow meters into HDPE bottles. Terminal products are 3× and 5× liquid laundry detergents, stain pretreaters, and hard-surface spray cleaners.
Competitive Tech-3827 Waterborne System Silicone Antifoam Emulsion prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Tech-3827 Waterborne System Silicone Antifoam Emulsion is supplied as an oil-in-water emulsion of poly(dimethylsiloxane), hydrophobised precipitated silica, and nonionic ethoxylate emulsifiers. The non-volatile silicone content is 25 ± 1 wt% when determined according to ISO 3251. The emulsion exhibits a Brookfield viscosity of 800–1500 mPa·s at 25 °C under ISO 2555 using an RVT spindle 3 at 20 rpm. The pH is maintained between 6.5 and 8.5 (ISO 787-9), and density is 1.00–1.02 g/cm³ (ISO 2811-3). Volume-weighted mean particle size by laser diffraction (ISO 13320) is 5–15 µm, with 90% of droplets below 20 µm. The product has a VOC content below 0.5 g/L under ASTM D6886. The primary distinction from mineral oil and polyether polyol defoamers is that the active phase combines a low-surface-tension poly(dimethylsiloxane) fluid, typically 21–23 mN/m, with a particulate hydrophobised silica that dewets and ruptures foam lamellae. This mechanism permits lower use levels and avoids the hydrocarbon solvent fractions commonly associated with mineral oil products.
| Property | Value | Test method |
|---|---|---|
| Silicone active content | 25 ± 1 wt% | ISO 3251 non-volatile residue |
| Viscosity | 800–1500 mPa·s at 25 °C | ISO 2555, Brookfield RVT, spindle 3, 20 rpm |
| pH | 6.5–8.5 | ISO 787-9 |
| Density | 1.00–1.02 g/cm³ | ISO 2811-3 |
| Mean particle size | 5–15 µm | ISO 13320 laser diffraction |
| Ionic character | Nonionic/anionic | Electrophoretic mobility |
| VOC content | <0.5 g/L | ASTM D6886 |
| Storage stability | 6 months at 5–40 °C | Internal QC |
Foam in high-shear waterborne coatings is generated by two distinct mechanisms. Pigment dispersion under a high-speed disperser creates macrofoam at the liquid–air interface, while letdown mixing and low-shear circulation entrain microfoam with bubble diameters below 30 µm. The microfoam population is often more persistent because the Laplace pressure inside small bubbles resists film rupture. The defoaming mechanism of Tech-3827 requires transport of a silicone droplet to the foam film, penetration of the aqueous pseudophase, and spreading at the air–water interface. The spreading coefficient S is expressed as S = γ_f − γ_d − γ_i, where γ_f is the surface tension of the foaming medium, γ_d is the surface tension of the defoamer droplet, and γ_i is the interfacial tension between the two phases. For the poly(dimethylsiloxane) phase at 25 °C, γ_d is approximately 21 mN/m, giving a positive spreading coefficient against most latex media with surface tensions of 33–45 mN/m. The hydrophobic silica particles embedded in the silicone phase lower the critical film thickness at rupture by adsorbing surfactant molecules and creating a local contact angle above 90° at the aqueous film surface.
Process limitations in latex paint manufacturing are observed when the whole defoamer dose is added before high-shear dispersion. In a 500 L jacketed vessel fitted with a 150 mm Cowles blade operating at 4–8 m/s tip speed, split addition of Tech-3827—50% of the total dose during the grind and 50% during letdown—maintained higher pycnometer density than a single pre-dispersion charge. Entrained air measured by ASTM D1475 produced a density shift from 1.12 g/cm³ to 1.30 g/cm³ in a titanium dioxide-containing acrylic base after 10 min at 1200 rpm when the entire dose was added before pigment dispersion. Split addition retained the higher density and prevented re-emergence of microfoam after 24 h of storage under gentle agitation. Repeated passes through a rotor-stator homogeniser at tip speeds above 12 m/s may fragment droplets below 1 µm, reducing lamellar penetration and redistributing active material away from the air–water interface. The emulsion is therefore recommended for addition at low to medium shear, below 8 m/s tip speed, unless a grind-phase dose is required as part of a split-feed protocol.
In waterborne wood coatings and water-based flexographic inks, the recommended starting dose of Tech-3827 is 0.1–0.3 wt% based on total wet formulation weight. The product is pre-dispersed and does not require solvent pre-dilution; however, it should be added under agitation at 200–400 rpm for 10–15 min to achieve uniform droplet distribution. Strongly foaming styrene-butadiene latexes may require 0.3–0.5 wt%, while low-surfactant polyurethane dispersions may show acceptable foam knockdown at 0.05–0.2 wt%. Addition above 0.7 wt% is not recommended in high-gloss clear systems because the excess silicone phase can generate cratering, fisheyes, and 20° gloss reduction. In a 40 °C storage test based on ASTM D1849, a 0.5 wt% addition in an acrylic clearcoat showed no visible phase separation but produced a gloss decrease of 3–5 GU on ISO 2813 black glass panels. The practical upper limit therefore depends on the optical specification of the film, not solely on foam-control performance.
For waterborne pressure-sensitive adhesives based on acrylic or urethane dispersions, foaming during roll coating and transfer can create pinholes and non-uniform coat weight. In this application, a dose of 0.05–0.2 wt% is typically added to the letdown stage because addition to the monomer phase may interfere with polymerisation kinetics. In textile finishing baths containing fluorocarbon water repellents, ionic compatibility must be checked. Published data for silicone antifoam interaction with fluorocarbon emulsions in textile padding is limited; a jar compatibility test at 25 °C for 24 h is required before production use.
Low-pH formulation conditions impose a stability boundary on silicone antifoam emulsions because protonation of the emulsifier layer reduces electrostatic repulsion and increases droplet–droplet attraction. In a vinyl acetate-ethylene dispersion at pH 5.0–5.5, the viscosity of Tech-3827 can increase from 1000 mPa·s to 2200 mPa·s within 48 h, and a visible cream layer may separate. The recommended processing window is therefore pH 6.0–9.5 and temperature 5–50 °C. Formulations requiring pH below 6.0 should be screened in a 500 mL jar stability trial for 72 h at 25 °C before production use. The emulsion is also not recommended with concentrated cationic polymer systems above pH 9.0 because charge inversion at the droplet surface can induce coalescence and loss of foam-control activity.
Differences from other products under acid stress are measurable. Mineral oil defoamers may maintain visual dispersion but can release hydrocarbon fractions that increase the coefficient of friction in dried acrylic primers and create intercoat adhesion loss. Polyether polyol defoamers with higher cloud points may resist acid-induced creaming but can require higher dosages to control microfoam on high-speed coating lines. Tech-3827 uses a nonionic/anionic emulsifier package that retains droplet size distribution within the specified pH range without the hydrocarbon solvent burden of mineral oil products. The absence of added mineral oil is confirmed by infrared spectroscopy with no absorbance bands in the 2920–2850 cm⁻¹ aliphatic C-H stretching region beyond the silicone methyl peaks near 2960 cm⁻¹ and 1260 cm⁻¹.
For paper coating colour based on kaolin, precipitated calcium carbonate, and styrene-butadiene latex, a total Tech-3827 dose of 0.2 wt% on dry pigment weight can be split 30% to the pigment slurry and 70% to the letdown tank. The grind-phase portion prevents air entrainment during high-shear mixing in the coating kitchen, while the letdown portion maintains deaeration during circulation to the blade coater. Pilot coating trials with a 250 mm helical gravure coating head at 150–250 m/min are used to validate gloss and print mottle because published data for silicone antifoam performance under blade coater shear rates above 10⁵ s⁻¹ is limited. In emulsion polymerisation, Tech-3827 is introduced after the pre-emulsion feed is established, typically at 0.05–0.15 wt% on total reactor charge, to suppress foam in unreacted monomer droplets without scavenging free radicals from the redox initiator system. For food-contact paper and paperboard, defoaming agents must comply with FDA 21 CFR 176.210; manufacturer confirmation should be obtained for the specific formulation because Tech-3827 is sold as an industrial emulsion and is not certified as a direct food additive. In wastewater defoaming of anionic polymer dispersions, a dilute 1 wt% stock solution in water may be used, but the diluted mixture must be consumed within 8 h because the preservative concentration drops below the effective minimum.
| Foam-control attribute | Tech-3827 | Mineral oil antifoam | Polyether polyol antifoam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical use level in waterborne paint | 0.1–0.5 wt% | 0.3–1.0 wt% | 0.2–0.8 wt% |
| VOC contribution | <0.5 g/L | Can exceed 50 g/L | Typically <20 g/L |
| Effect on 20° gloss at top dose | Low; measurable reduction above 0.7 wt% | Moderate haze in clear films | Low to moderate depending on cloud point |
| Low-pH stability | pH 6.0–9.5 recommended | Broad but solvent may exude | Broad; may lose efficiency below pH 5.5 |
| Dispersion requirement | Add under low shear; no pre-dilution required | May require pre-dilution with solvent | Add as supplied or pre-diluted in water |
| Main defoaming mechanism | Silicone spreading plus hydrophobic silica film rupture | Oil spreading; slower dewetting | Block copolymer adsorption; weaker film rupture |
Laser diffraction data for Tech-3827 show a volume-weighted mean particle size between 5 µm and 15 µm, with 90% of droplets below 20 µm. This distribution controls the trade-off between fast defoaming and surface defect formation. Droplets above 25 µm can act as crater nuclei in solvent-free topcoats with 20° gloss above 85 GU because they create local surface tension gradients that produce Marangoni-driven flow away from the droplet. Droplets below 1 µm may not rupture foam films efficiently and can be lost into latex particle surfaces. The 5–15 µm median window positions Tech-3827 for use in satin and semi-gloss waterborne enamels without the haze penalty usually associated with mineral oil antifoams. The product remains compatible with associative thickeners of the hydrophobically modified ethoxylated urethane type because its nonionic surface does not competitively bind to thickener hydrophobic cavities in the same manner as high-acid anionic dispersants.
When the emulsion is added to a high-gloss polyurethane dispersion at 0.3 wt%, the 20° gloss measured according to ASTM D523 on glass panels can be maintained above 85 GU, provided the addition is made after thickener incorporation and before final pH adjustment. Mechanical stress from filtration at 5 µm cartridge filters may remove a fraction of the silicone phase; therefore filtration should occur before antifoam addition or a filter rating of 10–20 µm should be used downstream. The emulsion is stable under normal paint circulation at 20–30 °C with progressive cavity pumps operating below 1500 rpm, but high-pressure homogenisation is not recommended because it shifts the droplet size distribution toward submicron sizes and lowers foam knockdown persistence after 7 days of shelf ageing.
In two-component waterborne epoxy primers for concrete, foaming during plural-component spray application can lead to pinholes and poor adhesion to saturated substrates. A dose of 0.2–0.4 wt% Tech-3827 added to Part A after pigment dispersion reduces foam density in the mixed material at 25 °C without altering the mixed-viscosity profile. The pot life of the mixed system is not affected by the silicone emulsion because the active phase does not react with the amine hardener; however, the product should not be pre-mixed with the amine Part B because the high pH above 10.5 can destabilise the emulsion within 24 h. In waterborne zinc-rich primers, zinc dust can absorb the silicone phase; therefore the addition is delayed to the letdown phase at a reduced dose of 0.1–0.2 wt% and the product is mixed for 15 min before filling.
The documented operational limitations of Tech-3827 include freeze-thaw sensitivity: storage below 0 °C can cause water-phase crystallisation, leading to droplet coalescence and oil separation after thawing. If the product is inadvertently frozen, it should be warmed to 25 °C and mixed at 300 rpm for 15 min; visible surface oil after mixing indicates irreversible emulsion break and the material should not be used in coatings that require optical clarity. The emulsion is not compatible with concentrated solutions of aluminium sulfate or ferric chloride; addition of these coagulants in the same feed line without sufficient dilution can break the emulsion. In waterborne flexographic inks based on acrylic-urethane hybrids, the maximum supported press speed for stable foam control is generally above 120 m/min, but this value is substrate-dependent and should be verified by print trial according to ISO 12647-6. Published data for ultraviolet-cure waterborne clearcoats containing silicone antifoam at the high end of the recommended dose is limited; adhesion to polycarbonate substrates must be tested before production use.